Reflections on EL Leadership conference

In August 2007 a group of parents connected with the Palouse Prairie School project met to discuss options, including staying with EL, or opting out. The general feeling was to stay. As we have worked with EL since then, I am increasingly convinced this was a good choice. Below is a report on an EL regional conference which gave me more evidence for the wisdom of the choice.

---

On Dec 4,5 Kirsten and I traveled to Oakland CA to attend our first EL-hosted conference. This was a regional conference with Principals and school designers from the California and NW regions.

(See also Kirsten's report here.)

My own goal going into the trip was to begin an acculturation to the EL community. About a dozen schools were represented, some traditional district schools made-over to EL and some charter schools. Some of the schools were EL from their founding, some were conversions from other models. Some had hand-picked staff, some had inherited staff.

My first reaction was that it was great to be talking about EL schools, with people who are doing it, getting away from the "what is EL, or why a charter school" kinds of questions we get at home.

The next impression was that this group of Principals is a valuable network of people (beyond the value of the EL school designer). Was Palouse Prairie School developing a 'experiential learning' school without connection to a national organization, we would be faced with a much larger challenge finding peers and collaborators. While the people at the conference didn't have cookie-cutter answers to our challenges, they have working models and are very willing to share (as ANSER, Summit and Pocatello have already demonstrated).

The workshop keynote was a presentation by Suzanne Gregg of ANSER about the approach they are using to assess teachers' skills relative to the EL core benchmarks and how that assessment helps teachers and leaders decide on the Professional Development learning targets. How refreshing -- assess where your school is against the EL model and choose professional development to move forward.

We also spent some time thinking about work plans (for the balance of 08-09 or for the next 18 months). I was able to eavesdrop on a designer-principal conversation and get a greater appreciation for the work plan form and how it was clarifying the school's thinking.

Finally, we were asked to describe some goals for our work plan and the staff used these to make collaborative teams. Palouse Prairie School ended up with ANSER, as we are have a shared interest in training new teachers in summer 09. We have agreed to explore how to collaborate, including EL training at Bainbridge Island and perhaps some combined PD at one or the other site or somewhere in between. We have the fortune to share John LeCavalier as our school designer, which should further enhance the collaboration.

The next of these regional leadership meetings is in Vancouver WA, the end of January. It is unclear who should attend from Palouse Prairie School. One thought is to send some of the same people and (knock on wood) our Principal. Another thought is to send other members of the Board, to broaden the base within the Board. We need to resolve that over the course of the next 4 weeks.